|
5/08/15
|
Four attorneys at Allen Matkins, the CA-based full service real estate and business law firm, have been elected to partnership. They are: real estate attorney Anthony R. Burney, in its San Francisco office; insolvency and receivership attorney Ted G. Fates and land use attorney Heather S. Riley in its San Diego office; and real estate litigation attorney Ryan T. Waggoner in its Los Angeles office.
Burney’s practice covers the full spectrum of transactional real estate, including leasing, financing, acquisitions and dispositions. He frequently drafts and negotiates office, retail and industrial leases for institutional and other regional landlords and has represented tenants in retail and office lease transactions throughout the West Coast.
Fates is a member of the firm's Receiverships, Bankruptcy, and Real Estate Finance practice groups. His practice focuses on representing creditors, receivers, and trustees in insolvency and litigation matters. He also specializes in equity receiverships initiated by federal regulatory agencies and has represented equity receivers appointed for various securities trading and investment firms, real estate and healthcare industry lenders, Internet-based investment programs and Ponzi schemes.
Riley's practice involves a variety of land use and environmental matters, with a particular emphasis on the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) compliance and writ litigation. She has experience with large and small-scale residential, commercial, mixed-use, educational and infrastructure development and redevelopment projects across California.
Waggoner is a real estate litigator with a practice that focuses on real estate-related dispute, including the financing of projects, construction litigation, and disputes between commercial landlords and tenants, buyers and sellers of real estate, and participants within an ownership group. He has successfully resolved a variety complex disputes at every level, through pre-litigation negotiations, mediation, arbitration and traditional litigation.
|
|
Return to the Archive page
|
|
|
|
|